Kani village – the usual mountain village. Cani – is one of the villages Kulinsky Lak area. Altitude – 1,800 m, distance from Makhachkala – 155-160 km. Kani – a former home Tinkerfolk, masons, and in the Soviet era – the cradle talented teachers, doctors, engineers, economists and scientists. Kani – originates from the small settlement nestled in the hills around the present village.
Earlier in antiquity around the present village of Kani were small settlements: ByachIaribakIu, AkIilabakIu, TsIovkIrabakIu, Butsulttahalu. This is evidenced by the remains of the foundations of houses, graves and other items. In kanintsev a legend for the extradition of married daughters of tuhuma "Avburttiguhul" in the settlement on the hill "ByachIaribakIu," and at this cemetery of our village is a monument with the inscription: Ayzhayzhallihal dushra, Avburttiguhal SSDS, Maylul chchatIaya chchatIayn Chchannu bizlay buvkIssara ("I am the daughter of renowned hunters, the sister of seven brothers, without stepping on the ground in the bushes ISIR, I went to the groom's house"). Different circumstances of economic, social and domestic nature caused the association of these settlement in one village. Gathered for site selection for construction of a new village elders decided to release all the settlements of two oxen, and the place where the oxen will fall to build a mosque and around the village to build a total. So it was selected location and construction of the present village. On the wall of the mosque is an inscription 1734god. Among the place names of interest to the title in certain localities, "GulutsIalu", "TsIuvkIravalu," and some others.
When it becomes clear, it is also clear that we all knocked on the temple walls of the provisions have a common foundation, the foundation on which these provisions based. Thus, it turns out, the temple of Apollo on the whole was a huge Tablet stone book of wisdom, showing what is the basis knowledge, the need is indicated on the front of it. And, therefore, builders of the church knew exactly what in general is a man, and knew that this could never understand those who do not understand the basis from which this knowledge flows. A related site: Keith Yamashita mentions similar findings. So William Shakespeare should have understood that his predecessors who were Homer and Vakhilid did not show his knowledge that in general there is a person, not because they did not have this knowledge, but only because they realized the futility of his remarks to people still do not understand the basis upon which this knowledge based. But all this does not diminish the importance and greatness of the way done by Shakespeare in this way, as it is described, and the builders of the temple at Delphi.
In the works of Shakespeare, this path is marked very clearly and detail. Unfortunately, this is what there is to become known to the author of the thumbnail works Imadeddin Nasimi (1370-1417). And it is quite small seems likely that in the future will become clearer sense of the words Mansour Hallaj (858-922 AD), which leads Nasimi in the following poem. Wastelands of oblivion was the holy spirit to light phenomena: the unspeakable melting in the radiance of clear meth is revealed! Star of Truth rose in minute spangles of life, and light it mastered evil – was warm sun, a phenomenon.
Stalin at this time all not yet felt a great need for qualified advice of military specialists and was mesmerized by the amount of cash divisions, without taking into account their actual combat power. However, this was like Hitler to Stalin. German plans attack on a large differ 1942 adventurousness. Winter offensive of the Red Army were in full off-road, which was not possible to quickly carry out operations in deep environment and the defeat of German compounds. The offensive was carried out on the tactics of World War I: infantry and cavalry, supported by artillery, that in the winter, a chilling maneuver off the roads to cover up their strong points German defense, led only to oust the Germans from the settlements (in the military reports of those years are referred to in the first place the name of the liberated smaller settlements, rather than the number of German prisoners of war), and This Red Army suffered heavy losses. While systemically front operations command and Headquarters of the Western Front was not planned, and local military operations to capture the individual settlements (and even cities), greater efficiency and the more strategic success – a major defeat of the enemy – do not bring. Neglect of Stalin functions of the General Staff has led to poor proschitannosti (in terms of supply by elongating the advancing communications in almost winter road connections) of the planned offensive. In the end, despite the unparalleled heroism of the advancing Soviet troops in the harshest winter conditions January 1942, thanks to the absence of the necessary supply of planned results are not achieved.
After reading numerous articles on the socrtico origin of coaching, I have thought about refuting such argumentation. Inlcuso is a company of RRHH and Coaching that is denominated like the Greek philosopher (1). Scrates was not coach, was a philosopher. Perhaps and coaching is a philosophy, but he is not philosophical. The socrtico method arises in the dialogues from its student Plato, as fundamental personage of that work, whose margins the history of the philosophy has been written that is also the history of the western thought. Pealver indicates, that ” accurately; the dialectic standard which finds enseando” (2).
Of all it is known, that the method of Scrates is the maieutic one. That one that by means of questions to the interlocutor, is slowly extracting the wisdom or the sapiencia of the questioned one. Classically it has been interpreted as if an own process of a matron one was. The mother of Scrates thinks that she was midwife of childbirths in Athens. In this sense one says that socrtico process consists more of remove-of, than in put-in (3). And of there, that many coachings affirm that like Scrates, coach can put or never impose the sapiencia, but it must cause that it leaves in the light of coachee (questioned). As if coach made wake up to us of the forgetfulness of the heideggeriano being.
The same Steiner, interpreted that Scrates did not teach anything. But the certain thing is, that Scrates died poisoned with cicuta, by its coacheados or taught fellow citizens. It wants to finish equal, the Coach? coach cannot affirm like ” that one that only knows that nada” does not know;. Coach cannot be limited to listen to oracles of Delphi, nor to pitonisas Greek. Coach cannot exert like a midwife. Scrates was condemned by Athens, for that reason he was ” tbano” of Athens.