On the other hand, the bad one denominated, soft sciences (social sciences or human sciences), apparently by the lack strictly speaking scientist (which is erroneous), no they have had the same development that its counterpart. He is fundamental to indicate that we did not assert that great discoveries have not been obtained, and excellent investigations in these areas; nevertheless in comparison with the scientific development, demonstrated by physical, natural sciences and their applied disciplines, as well as the promotion that these receive, social sciences have been despised and left second term. What can generate consequences negative as much environmental or social levels, on the matter Robert Howard comments to us: " when the technology ties to mandates of the corporative control, the work often becomes the antithesis of the kingdom of libertad." 2 That is to say, the technology applied without a guide in the social aspects can end at negative consequences. The possible cause is in that social sciences do not represent possibility of productive investments like the others, since their products cannot directly be patented and be commercialized, like a new computer or a medicine, reason why capital with that they count for his investigations comes from governmental bottoms or civil associations. But, why it has not been sufficient with the development of the physical-natural scientific branches and its applied disciplines? In the first place the virtuous spiral of the viable development, when including social aspects, directly forces to us to focus investigations and dissertations in the fields of human sciences. And secondly, (more important that previously perhaps mentioned) it is necessary that the development of the civilization, the application of the scientific knowledge (of any branch), the economic and productive activity, generally the life of the man in society, is channeled in compatible parameters with the model of the viable development. And although a panacea to this point does not exist, yes it is possible to find scientific and objective tools that they help us like species to reach this objective. Here it is where Social Sciences enter game, only through them the civilization will be able to find an advisor in the dark of its way.
Lamentably, for Rondas Farmers wilfulness and freedom for its conversion in Committees of Self-defense were denatured with the DS N 002-93-DE/CCFFAA, when establishing its adjustment forced or obligatory to the mentioned organizational form of self-defense promoted by the security forces, without having sustenance in legal norm some of greater hierarchy. From the historical and normative-functional point of view, Rondas Farmers is different from the Committees of Self-defense in which, first, they arise for the combat of the delinquency, the internal maintenance of order and the resolution of communal conflicts, is independent and permanent and, second, they are originated to face the subversive groups like part of the counter-insurgent state strategy, with the character of transitory and dependent of the Armed Forces. f) The rounds farmers and indigenous the special jurisdiction As it has been indicated previously, the Constitution of 1993, in its article 149, under constitutional configuration of the Peruvian State like a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic nation, when regulating the roll of Rondas Farmers, was affiliated with the spirit of the regulation of the rondero institute contemplated in the General Law of Communities Farmers of 1987 and to a certain extent it picked up the Native reference to Rondas of the Regulation of Organization and Functions of the Committees of Self-defense of 1992, since it recognized its character of organs of support (aid) of the communal authorities native farmers and in the exercise of its jurisdictional functions, within its territorial scope, according to its customary right and with the limit of not violating the fundamental rights of the people. Nevertheless, of the constitutional text it does not appear an express mention to Rondas Farmers organized outside the scope of the Native Communities and the Communities Farmers, who, according to the first Law of Rounds Farmers of 1986, they are in force in which is pertinent by the legislation of the communities farmers without for that reason they become such communities and have like essential functions the defense of their earth, the care of their cattle and other goods, as well as the cooperation with the authorities in the elimination of any crime.