Concepts like their trajectory, their convictions, the values morals, their preferences, their personal sensitivity, their likings of all the life, would not count anything in the personal history of the humanity. Since we have stood out in the text, all the concepts studied in the modules have been reviewed, from the ambiguity of the concept culture that loses the idea of territoriality in favor of the idea of social multiproperty than more geographic, adheriendo itself more to the culture-civilization concept. We also happen through the debate of Universalimos where the cumulative individual happens to be a whole and the particular thing happens to enrich the Universal thing. The concept cultural diversity fruit of the interrelation, contrasts and of the contact between diverse cultures, where the relativismo is explained by interests of being able or the critic to the etnocentrismo and its hierarchies based on the inequalities and/or the tried acculturation that not always obtain like in Maalouf and that we must continue fighting by its coexistence. Also there are outstanding the funcionalista sense of the actions social taking relevance according to the context and the moment. As a result of the final pretension of the text: not to lift the beliefs over truth of the coherence, we have not happened more than of finishing nails through the psychological categories and/or collective personality, where attitudes, behaviors and proper values of the societies are associated that we delimited ourselves territorially. We have visited the idea of another one as it threatens and like idealisation, leaders and foreigners. And mainly we have handled to the interculturalidad terms, criticizing the homogenization like dominant and indiferenciador criterion of the individuals (loss of the identity) with respect to the globalising moment that surrounds to us.
We have not spoken of pluralism, that is rather good and desirable a summation of cultures, but that it entails stratification and coexistence against the interaction idea that a new society with the use of characters, properties or particularitities based on the relevance of the context would generate partly. Either the text speech of multiculturalismo associated to the vindications of national and ethical minorities within a be-nation, del that the Spanish territory is a mosaic to study. And we have used the fundamentalisms, like beliefs, nationalisms, religions, to explain that there are to be discarded, although they are used to justify the genocides and the etnocidios. Accepting like term conciliator a culture sense that secures a consensus in the values, the norms, and that is subject to the changes to balance the relations of being able when these are altered.