But, it is necessary that this tool well is defined to extend the quarrels and debates. The Moodle Platform, presents great varieties of tools and this aid in the pedagogical look, as much for the pupil how much for the professor (tutorial). to confirm this thesis, the construction of knowing can be widely argued by all the participants, what it does not differentiate of the traditional methods educational. To search ' ' solues' ' pedagogical it will depend mainly on the tools of the platform and of the participants who interact together in the activities, learning and teaching with the readings proposals with its personal arguments. Therefore, the pedagogical look of the course is entirely on in the dynamics of the course and its tools, found in the Moodle Platform. On the Interface of the Glossary, I believe that it finishes in the distance being plus one them many tools of support it course of Education, to extend the interaction of the excessively participant ones. On the interactive construction, tool EASY, was projected with the objective to maximize the interaction and accessibility to the courses carried through in the Moodle, marking the differential for that reads and interacts with the integrant participants and tutors of course EAD. With this, it would like in the distance to approach the importance of the course in the standards of the Moodle Platform, inside of the current educational context. Therefore, in the day to day running, the pupil and the professor (mediating) need to manage its tasks and consequently to have ample knowledge, in the direction of readings with the depositions of the colleagues of course and mainly of the texts considered for the reading, marking positively the call: He was of the Education in the distance ' ' inside of the exaggerated capitalism. Another suggested text that it deserves prominence in the course, was what it approached the Concepts of Education in the distance and the Complementary Material: To know Authorial profile of the pupil, Netiqueta and Direitos.
Through the allocation space differentiated of the equipment of collective consumption, the State also intervenes with the residential segregation … (CORRA, 2005, pg. 26). Then the State through the allocation differentiated space in the city and of services of collective consumption generates an increase of prices of lots and property for one determined parcel of the society, causing with this certain homogeneity in its partner-space content. In Araguana it is noticed some areas, where resident inhabitants have greater purchasing power, this fact can be observed in the sectors: Noroestes, Tecnorte, Anhangera and Urbanstico, where these areas have high values, according to its localization, regarding the values referring the localizations, Villaa (2001) comment: …
The land? localization alone is monopoly? or better, the monopoly alone weighs significantly in the price? in rare, as the front for the sea and Ipanema, or the sight for the Bread of sugar, all land has, is truth, some degree of monopoly, but in the majority of the cases this degree is small the determination of the being price. The land? localization, as any product, basically has its definitive price for the conditions of its production (for its cost of production, as Lefebvre said) for its value. (VILLAA, 2001, pg. 75). But the State, when privileging definitive areas in the urban one of Araguana, creates uneven localizations fruit of differentiated infrastructure allocation, to take care of definitive capitalist interests, this fact generates a differentiated valuation, causes in turn a process of residential segregation, fruit of this urban clutter.
Exactly the planned city being of the beginning to the end, the State segregates in the same way, regarding this fact Corra (2005), says on the origin and evolution of the city of Mrida in the peninsula of the Yucatan, in Mexico in century XV. The city was planned around a central square. The four blocks delimited that it had been reserved for the cathedral, the buildings of the governments provincial and municipal and the residence of heads of the conquerors.
Revealing doencanto and of the popular soul, pleasant lyric flavor: (BETTER, 1935, p.5) ‘ ‘ 1558) presenteno general cancioneiro, (before to desteviajar for Italy, when it changed the style for sonetos in decasslabos,). Isoto if not only explains because S erafamoso Miranda for quadrinhas emversoshexasslabos, but emontona lyric pelafeio. (These were also caractersticasprprias of cantigas of love Gallego-Portuguese) What it also limited poetical acomposio, for only, enters two four estrofes. But with the same sofreguido of the loves perdidossentido in verses of Francisco de Brazilian Souza, and others, with asmesmascaractersticas in the versificao muitoslusitanos symmetry, similars eem tambma of cancioneiros celebrities: ‘ ‘ With me I had a difference of opinion myself,/I am rank in all danger; /no to possoviver with me,/nor I can run away from me. /.
With pain of people it ran away,/before queesta thus grew; /now> to be dumb (Francisco de Sousa In: CAPADELLI) Lady my good breaks so sad my eyes for you,/quenunca so sad checks outrosnenhunspor nobody. (Joo Ruiz Castello Branco In: CAPADELLI) Nestaltima estrofe you rhyme, them in alternation are also gifts in the cantorias deXiquinha. Olirismo, escrnioe maldizertambm is gifts in our literatos. The poetry of Gregorio de burlesque, ertica and satirical sejalrica Matos, sacra, deeply is taken root Brazilian nessarealidade, especially in its two last sources, esatrica, that register the customs and the moral life, social the ertica and dacapital politics of the colony. Priests, nuns, military, employees of> endios land government, traders, proprietors, noblemen, Jews, adventurers, slaves are personages of the vast composed panel for the poet, who treated suaterratal as he was under the maisvariadospontos of sight: Let us observe its verses: Politician: The demon to live if displays,/no matter how hard the fame exalta, /numa city where it lacks/truth, honor, shame. (>) God is valid us, what he costs,/What El-King in the ones of the one of favour.
The poetry contemporary is the reaction of poetical sensitivity to the racionalizante world of the consumption capitalism that takes off of the modern man the subjectivity becomes, it anonymous, being insignificant part of a great mass consumer. To the poet, in its substance that is the poetry, the paper fits to give to the common man an importance layer as form to place it as to be only incomparable and bonanza. Of – it a new to look at for the reality, provides a new behavior, a new relation with its time, the exacerbado and marcante materialism in its life. The poetry contemporary in the ones of a possibility to feel of true form the world as a whole, taking off of us that sensation of only being part as a gear that makes possible the maquinal functioning of reproduction of the rationality. To think, to look at, to reflect and to perceive are party to suit of sensation of completude of the man. Process this that makes in them to be uncommon and only in the world. The poet, through the organization of the poetical language, it has the power of convoking in them for the release, in freeing of the claws of the rational world.
Through the poetry it is that we leave the world of the transcendncia of our individual and physical body for a body collective spiritual and. The poetry is one constant exercise of reaprendizagem of new possibilities to see world the same. this is the paper of the great poet. As Coleridge said: ' ' The quality of a great poet is present in all part and in no part evidente' is visible as a stimulaton; '. (COLERIDGE Apud Pound. p. 34). The cited affirmation comes to corroborate with what it is come close deducing in the conjecture of poetical making. It does not fit to the poet if to show visible to the world contemporary, fits it to work the poetical language to fortify the intuition of its reader; to make to reflect it and if to feel useful in the collective of its world.