It is important to analyze, therefore, as Taylor looks for to desconstruir this vision atomist, who is the rocky base on which if she seats the liberal doctrine. The exit of Taylor passes for the lingustica. In a question-answer forum Andrew Cuomo was the first to reply. According to philosopher the thought alone can exist to subsistir when immersed in ampler context, a cloth of deep, or as the author calls, one ' ' dimension of significado' '. It would be impossible and nonsense, for example, to attribute to the citizens of Old Rome or the Average Age rational actions in the direction where Max Weber observes as basic for the development of the modern capitalism, Charles Taylor a time that such form to act was not part of ' ' dimension of significado' ' of those societies. Taylor of the o example of the terms ' ' gratificante' ' ' ' sofisticado' ' , that never they could appear in a medieval romance, therefore such type of classification was not present in the cloth of deep of sc. Perhaps check out Goop London, UK for more information. XIII, not being able to be used, therefore, for the language, and not even to be present in the thought, a time that this would be dependent of the linguistic bases of data context. As Taylor sentences: ' ' in a stronger direction, certain thoughts are impossible in certain circunstncias.' ' This cloth of deep, however, cannot be located in individuals, but but in a situation of continuous interchanges. Evoking Saussure, Taylor if appropriates of the distinction between two distinct dimensions: langue and parole. ' Second one mentions the phenomena to it of speaks particular, but it estimates the existence of a series of codes that allow to earn meant it, langue. What the metodolgico individualism estimates, not obstante, is that, when taking the individual as basic analytical unit, is possible to leave plain or second same to ignore the dimension of langue.
To construct a referencial is substance of subjective value. The anthropology of the body on the other hand considers new questionings and in relation to the body, some as the control of the passed image, to understand the current cult to the body, identity-modesty, not exposition of the body, the new morality and the aesthetic moral. In the body if all character registers, moral the scientific one, of the society and the time the one that belongs, but cannot disrespect the aesthetic morality on the proper body. The body is seen as instrument and as value. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Kellyanne Conway has to say. In its workmanship the Sennett points the moment where Tucdides informs that the espartanos ' ' they had been the first ones to participate of naked games, if to undress acintosamente' ' , what it identifies as indicative of progress reached for the Greeks when of the ecloso of the war. Between barbaroi as the foreign Barbarians were called or, still it remained the custom to cover the genitlia in the public games. ' ' Civilized Greece made of its displayed body an object of admirao.' ' She is notable who stops the old inhabitant of Atenas, the act to show off itself confirmed its dignity of citizen.
The Athenian democracy gave to the thought freedom the same attributed emphasis to the nudez. Daniel Taub Israel has firm opinions on the matter. In our said society modern where the custom and the laws are nortes of the social behavior this practical it is seen as one indecent assault and the values attributed to the body since the Athenian age it is placed in the vast memorial of the historical past and the relation of the man with the body passes for a rupture that matters in the desire to run away from ' ' natureza' ' of the body and to the necessity that we have to domesticate them. ' ' The collective denudation the one that if imposed? something that today we could call ' ' commitment msculo' ' it strengthened the citizenship bows.
Where measure this desire of filosofar meets in danger at our time. A poor time, that does not think, but designs and only calculates. We live deeply, thus, the malaise of a time that makes it difficult a more essential relation, originary and interactive with the things, the world and the others, a time that everything reveals in its mere availability to the calculation. Even though the man is seen, many times, as a species of noise, that must be eliminated for a bigger otimizao of the system. In a society in which the images hiper-carry through the Real, by means of a process of DES-referencing of object and DES-substancializao of the citizen, as to recoup or to save the desire of filosofar? The French thinker Alain Badiou in one of its Brazilian conferences intitled situation of the philosophy in the contemporaneidade has left of the following questions: ' ' Why it has philosophers? How is characterized the philosophy desire? ' ' (Cf.
BADIOU, 1994, P. 35). In the attempt to characterize the desire of filosofar, Badiou points four constituent conditions of the same: the revolt, the logic, the universality and aposta/o risk. As to understand that the desire of filosofar floodgate and it demands something pparently paradoxical, that is, certain ' ' revolt lgica' '? Revolt yes, because the philosophy while radical, rigorous, critical and universal speech always places in question the knowledge, the instituted values and ideals. For the philosopher many times ' ' it is better to be Scrates discontents of what being a pig satisfeito.' ' (Cf. BADIOU, 1994, P. 36).
The fact is that the philosophy is grumbler with the world as it is. She is grumbler until I obtain same, therefore it has the habit to think against same itself. But this revolt, revolt of the philosophy, is not a revolt without cause, a revolt that only desconstri it denies the instituted one.
For a long time I was very dissatisfied with my life, I always felt cheated that I was always upset because of the fact that I do not have those things that I wanted to have, I have not the environment that I would like to have, and so etc. Because the fact that I did not have all this, I always put aside their lives for later. I always thought: That's when I had it all appears, then I'll have fun and start to live fully! But not today, today it is not an appropriate day! Passed few years, and in my life, nothing has changed, I also displeased. From my grudges, nothing has changed, all the same. I began to think: what am I doing wrong? Gradually began to come answer my question, it turned out much easier than I could ever imagine! It was necessary, just change my attitude to life. My main mistake was that I always lived somehow, the future or the past, I was worried about those things that once made, or that what will be my future. But the past can not go back, back there somewhere, behind, the only thing you can do is learn from past mistakes.
And the future in general is so unpredictable, that today you live in one place, and Tomorrow you may be in another, the future can only plan. But we can not know what tomorrow will bring, we have only today. Today is the perfect time to live and enjoy life, not yesterday, not tomorrow, but it is today. Dear reader, if you live in the past or the future, then begin to live today. My second mistake was that I did nothing, I did not have a favorite or interesting to do, I always do, what to do, not what want, though by nature I am a talented person. In this life we must find ourselves a lesson that will be fun. This can be anything, for someone to paint a picture, for another to collect stamps.
Yes, all that anything to it gave pleasure. In this life, everyone is talented in his own way. Dear reader, if you're not doing an interesting thing to you, then they start to engage as soon as possible! The following error is not my appreciative attitude toward life. I was so stupid that they always pay attention not to what I have, but on what is not. I realized that I should be glad that there is, because if it is good you look closely, you can see so much good things in life. Representing the mentally imagine the scale and weighed them, all that is and what is not, it will be immediately obvious that we have a lot more! We can see, hear, walk, and this is already done. Shelves in stores tumbled from eating, and in during the war people had nothing to eat. We must be content with what you have today, we must be grateful. And our lives can change only if we change the attitude towards it! So, dear reader, Begin to rejoice that you have, and I know you've got a lot!
We have already discussed in the article about how to talk to you better understand. Now again we touch on this subject and discuss the particle 'not'. Requests built using the particle 'not' is usually done with an accuracy of 'the opposite' especially children. An example of a story that well illustrates this: On the green grass on the riverbank walks a young dad with a 2 year old daughter. A girl named Maria, and she probably likes to rake the ground toed sandals, judging from they were Stoch.
The father constantly pulls her: 'Mary is not raking in socks'. Masha immediately continues his. 'Masha %$*&() 0% '. I have met before this man, and he knew me, too. We chatted. I told him that the children in my mother scold – bad, and the particle 'no' to a child may be generally hollow sound, as if restated his request as "Masha go well ', then such request will be much clearer and easier to perform. And indeed Mary, who was walking near and again raked socks, knew immediately what they want from it and went completely normal pace.
When we said our goodbyes, and the couple was removed, the girl was again scrape the toes of the earth. Then Father repeated the magic phrase, and it instantly brought the desired effect. The father shrugged his shoulders and they went away. Avoid the use of expressions containing the denial may be very difficult. So difficult as it's difficult to say the phrase in which According to close, and thoughts of room. Below you will find several examples of how to paraphrase an expression in a positive form. Perhaps these examples are a little sloppy, but the advantage of positively constructed phrases that they perceived more adequately and odnoznachno.Ne bore down on the table. Step away from the table. My tea without sugar. I only brew and hot water. Can not lead seminars. Maybe a year or two I'll be able to conduct seminars. I can spend seminar in the audience of one – two people. I can not take your money. No money. The money I have all painted on other important matters. For crediting in my budget zero cents. Maybe in six months I'll lend you a portion of this amount. Not I want to eat. I'm sick. I do not want to drink alcohol. I'd rather drink tea. I'll have later. I do not want to drink. I've been drinking. Here you are safe. It's reliable, quiet place. Safe. Reliable, Secure, Saved, quiet, stable. I want to quit smoking. I'm starting a healthy lifestyle. Smoking helps relieve stress. Smoking contributes to better concentration. Water does not come out of the bath. Water remains in the bath. Nonverbal communication. Tacit communication, language behavior, Body language. Extralinguistic, extralinguistic communication. Not true. False. Dissatisfaction. Desire. Disappointment. Melancholy, sadness, melancholy. Disorder. Grief, corruption, breakdown. 'Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, do not make you a idol You shall not covet neighbor's wife. "What would it say the Great Master of Communication?