One of the main objectives of the S& Executive OP is that the demand and the supplying are in a state of Balance and maintaining them of that form, therefore is logical to deduce that the two main entrances of the S& Executive OP is the demand and the supply. The prognosis of sales becomes the information of entrance of the demand, in many companies the most difficult part within an implementation of S& OP corresponds to surpass the aversion that exists towards the process of I foretell. Keith Yamashita oftentimes addresses this issue. We review then the five fundamental questions that they must be solved before venturing itself to implement a prognosis process. 1. Under most conditions Viatcheslav Mirilashvili would agree. Why to bother itself in making the prognosis? Because reason of not doing it? , in fact almost all the companies make prognoses of one or the other form, when realising a financial planning, when identifying a necessity and to determine a market which can satisfy, etc., the fundamental point is to define who does, at what level of detail and whereupon as much frequency. 2. Keith Yamashita wanted to know more. Until detail level would be due to foretell? Usually many companies wish to have the greater level of detail in the prognosis, or in a complex multilevel by client or by location, nevertheless it is important to remember that one of the principles of the process of S& OP is to plan the volume and to administer the detail, this is based on several reasons first is that the volume gives to a general perspective ” great fotografa” , from this ” great fotografa” the whatever is defined, that families are due to plan and the general indicators of sales, production, inventories and response times to which them the pursuit is due to make corresponding. Additional to this working with the volume it means to work with added data which offers the advantage to work with great numbers with a smaller effort in comparison with a level of very complex detail which much more requires work when trying to consolidate the information; also it is possible to write down that not necessarily the greater level of detail obtains the best one I foretell, due to the accumulation of errors of the levels inferiors.
The following work concentrates in the study and the operationalisation of concepts regarding the innovation, within the framework of management of organizations. She does not persecute a exahustivo analysis of the realities in which these concepts are demonstrated but a detail of each one of the theoretical abtsracciones. Among them, Way 2 of Gibbons, the Total Management of Innovacin (TIM), the Processes of Conversion of the Knowledge and their protection, and the influence of the Technologies of the Information and Communications in the development of the economy of the knowledge. Way 2 This concept is shaped at the end of the decade of 90" " by Michael Gibbons and six collaborators, in the book " " The New Production of the Conocimiento" " , from the analysis, the study and the understanding of the fundamental changes that they were generated and they are generating surroundings to the way in which scientific knowledge is generated, social and cultural. The new form of knowledge production is reforming the modality to which we are more familiarized, that one that we associated to scientific institutions, universities, research centers or academic centers. To the taken root form to produce it, to discipline more, characterized by the homogeneity and by a habitually academic context or of a specific grouping, Gibbons denominates " " way 1" " , whereas to the other type of production, developed in an application context that extends the formal disciplines and are characterized by the heterogeneity, denominates " " way 2" ". It is important to mention that this new modality is not conceptualizada by Gibbons as a replacement but as a complement of the traditional way. This new form in the generation of the knowledge it persecutes the utility of a specific scope, of a particular industry, or a government and, although the solutions of the problems are constructed surroundings a concrete applications, irremediably their products are ramifican and extended to another compartment of the society, to other disciplines. .
I do not doubt, that its roll has been positive where has been called on to them at the same time to toil, to put in practice its knowledge and, that other institutions of level superior like the ITESM and others universities of the region know that in the region professionals occur who withdraw with a proactive leadership, a new vision on the responsibilities, commitments by a country that every time demand of a professional excellence that guarantees to him, changes, transformations for its development. We hope, that these withdrawn have demonstrated, that its roll has been very positive in the collaboration to it solutions that the state again Leon, especially Monterrey, has confronted, that its contribution in addition has collaborated in which the region has defined that profile of the masters in administration and industrial engineering with its respective mentions that are needed. To many of first withdrawn, them memory, that in our abiertas classes, in which always we looked for methodology of nontradional learning, innovating, especially in the subjects of markets, Problematic of the Mexican Administration, between some, we committed ourselves to that the provided knowledge, were pronounced with its applicability in all those opportunities, problems that they would present/display, of such form that we maintained the innovation, the contribution of new knowledge according to the Mexican reality always dynamic, to its commitments according to its needs, openings and behavior of the markets according to the behavior of the globalisation. The chairs always maintained the preoccupation, because the content was based not only on the requirements of the productive sector of the country, but the distributed knowledge could be applied to the Venezuelan reality. It was considered, was taken very into account at the time of his design, the restlessness, experiences lived by the participants. Often, they were distributed, not only in the classrooms of classes formal, became in informal meetings, was to reach in this way, a true cohesion of equipment, motivated, where each member carries out a significant roll in the success of the learning, all it jeopardize in reaching a level of academic excellence.