Replacement training is the placement of an aide, emerged from criteria based on contiguity and analogy, to cover the shortfalls. Here, Frank Armijo expresses very clear opinions on the subject. The fate of that to what comes to pass defense is another I, split, and the fate of what is posited as a replacement is becoming a casualty. The structure that generates Defense is purified the self-pleasure (on the final real self), the development of affection factor is the sense of annihilation of self-pleasure purified. Freud (1919) highlights the establishment of a dual (ideal) as a powerful reassurance to the annihilation of the ego feeling of uncanny arises as a result of effort (failed) to sustain a relationship of primary identification with the denial, the superego arises when the illusion leads to a disappointment. This theoretical distinction allows an inference to the extent that dominates the denial, the current mental state of secondary identification, origin of the superego, is jammed or weakened in its constitution. (Later we will see the relationship between the educator and the instance superego narcissistic self-observation). Described the general characteristics of the defense, I will summarize briefly some peculiarities. My aim is to advance the foundation for understanding the relationship between teacher self-observations at his instance and the problem doubles.
The contradicted the trial aims to refute the superego, but the structure remains intact. Falls mainly on two of the three functions of the superego: self-observation and conscience. The denial to the trial of the superego is, as developed at the trial of existence, a successful half mechanism, designed to refute what is both accepted, and the question requires a logically prior moment in the trial was uttered (Freud, 1927).